Videos shot on the phone are simply breathtaking. These gripes apply to the front camera as well. If portrait mode worked, it would be far more useful. High key mono feels more like an advanced black 'n white image mode. Images, especially those captured in harsh lighting, tend to look very natural and I'm quite impressed by how the iPhone manages to maintain the dynamic range (colours in the brightest and darkest areas of an image) in almost any light. Apple's managed to improve upon its HDR tech and most photos are easily competitive with those taken from the Pixel 3. Regardless, photos shot on either camera are, frankly, top class. Yet another advantage of the tele is that its field of view makes for better portrait shots.Ĭlick on the images below to view the entire album on Flickr It's also not clear if Apple's upcoming and intriguing Deep Fusion tech will be supported on the ultra-wide. Images from the tele are less distorted for one, and the camera also supports optical image stabilisation (OIS) and Night Mode, neither of which you'll find on the ultra-wide. While the ultra-wide is indeed interesting, I think the tele is much more useful. Personally, I'd have preferred a wide + tele combo on the rear. What this means is that you can now, finally, record 4K60 videos and as a bonus, partake in the dubious joys of slo-mo selfies, a feature that Apple's decided to dub 'slofies'. The front camera also sees a major upgrade to a new sensor with a 12 MP resolution. The iPhone 11 features a 12 MP f/1.8 wide-angle camera and a 12 MP f/2.4 ultra-wide angle camera. Image: Anirudh Regidi/Tech2 These cameras are simply spectacular and the addition of Night Mode means that they're finally competitive with Google's Pixel and Huawei's Mate series of smartphones. In what is certainly an upgrade to last year's model, the iPhone 11 features two cameras on the rear: a 12 MP f/1.8 wide and a 12 MP f/2.4 ultra-wide. iPhone 11 carries one of the best cameras Apple makes While the phone doesn't support 5G yet, a technology that has yet to mature, it does support the fastest Wi-Fi standards, and 4G LTE that's a bit slower than what the best phones have to offer. This time around, the iPhone 11 also carries as much RAM as its more expensive siblings, making it a no-compromise device as far as performance is concerned. A lower resolution means fewer pixels to drive which means there's less stress on the chip (the A13 Bionic, in this case) powering the phone. On the performance front, the iPhone 11 one-ups even the Pro phones because it features a lower resolution screen. Apple's silicon is easily a year or two ahead of Android's best and even "gaming" phones like the ASUS ROG II (Review) and certified powerhouses like the OnePlus 7T (Review) are barely managing to compete with last year's crop of iPhones. iPhone 11 is the fastest phone Apple makesĪs it stands, the iPhone 11 is basically the fastest phone in the world. If your wallet won't allow it, continue reading for an analysis of the 11. If you're considering the Pro, head here for Nimish Sawant's breakdown of what puts the 'pro' in iPhone 11 Pro. These phones aren't without issues, though, and despite being the best phones that Apple sells, they're not necessarily the best phones for you.īut how do you decide? Do you shell out a premium for the iPhone 11 Pro or do you settle for the more sensible iPhone 11?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |